Reviews

Scosche RHYTHM+ | ANT+/Bluetooth optical pulse sensor

Advertisement
Movilan - Accesorios telefonía móvil

Esta página está disponible en español

The Scosche RHYTHM+ sensor is neither a new product nor a novelty in the category. In fact, it has been on the market for two years now, more than enough time for optical measurement to be introduced more and more among us, even directly into the watches themselves.

So why am I analyzing it now? Well, because until now it wasn't directly available in Spain. But if the Mio Link Between us, which works very well and is also compatible with ANT+ and Bluetooth devices, why do I bother to analyze this other option? Is it better than Mio Link? Well, it's not better or worse, it's the same... but different, as you will discover throughout the article. And obviously because I know first hand another different sensor, manufactured in this case by Valencell.

This Scosche RHYTHM+ has not been ceded by the manufacturer, but I bought it directly from Amazon So, as I always remind you, if you want to collaborate with the site and help to keep new product tests going, buy your Scosche through the links I provide (it doesn't have to be the RHYTHM+ Scosche, you can also buy a toaster or some socks, whatever you need). It won't cost you anything, but you will return a small amount that supports both the site and the work I do on it.

And without further ado, we're going to debug this optical sensor. Is it better or worse than the Mio Link? Well, you'll know in a little while.

Unpacking

Scosche RHYTHM+

The Scosche RHYTHM+ is a very simple device, it is simply a pulse sensor and does not go beyond sending heart rate data to another device, so you will not find much inside the box.

In the "window" of the box you can see the sensor with a strap. Besides, you can find an additional strap (longer than the one already placed in the sensor), the charging cable and the instruction manual that, as I always say, you can totally ignore (that's why you are reading this).

Scosche RHYTHM+

Here you can see the two straps. Both are exactly the same in terms of material and closure, the difference between the two is the length. So the small one you can use to put it on your wrist and the big one for your upper arm or really wherever you want. Yes, you can also measure your pulse HERE, if that's what you were thinking about...

Scosche RHYTHM+

The sensor itself is a plastic square and includes two pins where to fix the strap. Be careful with the knocks, because it is made of plastic and if any part of the two supports, the next option to fix it is with insulating tape.

The sensor is turned on by simply pressing the S at the top. There is a control LED that will indicate if it has found a pulse, if it is on, etc. And with an application (which is only available in iOS) it is also possible to select a working zone. If it flashes purple you are in zone, blue below the zone and red above it.

Scosche RHYTHM+

The back is like looking at a refrigerator from behind. It's ugly, but it's what makes it work. Surrounding the sensor are three LEDs. Two illuminate in green, and the central one (more rectangular in size) is yellow, in theory to improve reading in darker skin types. Above the light and sensor assembly you'll see two metal circles, simply where the charging connector is placed.

The body of the sensor also indicates that it is waterproof, according to characteristics provided by Scosche the resistance is IP67. Therefore, it is resistant to immersion at 1m depth for 30 minutes, although it is actually able to withstand more. But compared to Mio Link it can present a problem, since the latter is certified for 30m. It is true that neither of the two sensors provides reliable data in swimming, but if you think about this sensor to perform a triathlon is a detail to be taken into account.

Scosche RHYTHM+

That was quick, wasn't it? Well, next thing you know, you're gonna know what devices it's compatible with.

Supported devices

Scosche RHYTHM+ can be connected to devices that have ANT+ or Bluetooth Smart technology. And it will do so simultaneously, so you can have the sensor connected to devices that use both types of standard. These can be ANT+ devices like your Garmin watch. Or Bluetooth devices like your Suunto Ambit3 or Polar M400. Even gym machines if they use either of these two types of connection.

The only thing you need to keep in mind is that ANT+ allows for multi-connection between devices. They all talk to each other in an equal relationship, so five devices can be connected to a single sensor.

Bluetooth, on the other hand, does not work in the same way; it has a master-slave relationship. A slave accessory (in this case the Scosche sensor) can only be connected to one master device, but not to several masters. However, that master (in this case it would be the watch) will be able to connect to several slave accessories (pulse sensor, cadence sensor, power sensor, etc.).

In short, the Scosche RHYTHM+ sensor can be connected simultaneously to any number of devices via ANT+ and to a single device via Bluetooth.

Making the connection is very simple, you just have to do the search from your watch. For example in the case of Garmin you just have to go to the configuration options and do a new search of devices.

Scosche RHYTHM+ - ANT+

Of course in other devices the procedure is similar, as in Ambit3, where again you have to enter the configuration options to do the sensor search.

Scosche RHYTHM+ - Bluetooth

For example, you can connect the sensor to a cycling computer and a mobile phone (using ANT+ and Bluetooth, you don't have to choose one or the other). Or to two different watches; one that you wear and one that your trainer wears next to you. And as I indicated earlier, Bluetooth and ANT+ are simultaneous.

Scosche RHYTHM+ - Dual connection

And so I could think of thousands of examples.

Where do I take this?

The sensor is exactly the same as any other optical pulse sensor. What a couple of years ago deserved to be explained in its operation, today it is almost universally known. A sensor that interprets changes in light absorption; green LEDs illuminate the capillaries, which together with each manufacturer's own algorithms - the most important part - allows the heart rate to be read. In the case of Scosche RHYTHM+ these green LEDs are assisted by another yellow LED which, in theory, serves to improve reading on different skin types.

Scosche RHYTHM+ - Sensor

If you want to know this type of measurement in more detail you can take a look at to what I published almost a year ago about itwhere I talk about technology in more detail.

Buscador de chollos

The main advantage of the Scosche RHYTHM+ is that you can wear it in many different locations: on your arm, on your forearm, on your wrist... Depending on the sport you're doing, even on your leg as if it were a triathlon chip (but not for running, as wearing it in that place causes too much impact and incorrect readings).

What for me may be a comfortable place to wear the sensor, for you may not be the ideal option, and vice versa, you can wear it where it is most comfortable for you along the whole arm.

The Scosche attachment system (a simple fabric strap with Velcro) allows you to wear the pulse sensor on almost any part of your body, fully opening up the range of options to wear the sensor as you wish.

Comparing RHYTHM+ with other sensors

Of course, the most important thing about the Scosche RHYTHM+ is the reliability of the data. There's no point in making it very comfortable or using it on various parts of the body if the data obtained is then useless.

And there is nothing better for checking the reliability of the reading than to pit the Scosche sensor against other sensors; both optical to see how it stands against them, and traditional chest sensors, which will give us the benchmark against which to make the comparison.

To start this test battery, a short 20-minute workout at an easy and constant pace. This is a tremendously simple test for any sensor, both chest and optical. Remember that if you click on the image you can see it at a larger size.

Scosche RHYTHM - comparative sensors

In the next training all three sensors are perfectly aligned (second up, second down). There are only discrepancies at the beginning of the activity, but this is common to all sensors, regardless of their technology (cold can give wrong readings on both the chest and optical sensors).

scosche-rhythm-comparison-2

As usual, running at a constant pace presents no problems for the optical sensors, and it is the activity in which they perform best, so it comes as no surprise that the Scosche performs so well.

Where it is most common to find differences in behaviour is in series training, caused by sudden changes in rhythm, rapid ups and downs in heart rate and the higher cadence, which can cause the sensor to be set to the "beats" of the cadence instead of the heart rate, which is called "cadence lock".

In the case of the Scosche sensor, it doesn?t present any problem. This is a short training with only two one-kilometer intervals at sub 4:00 rhythms. I?m in full recovery from twin and soleus problems, so at the moment this kind of sessions are "limited" so I haven?t been able to do longer series training.

Garmin Vivosmart HR - Sensor Comparison

The result is perfect, coinciding at all times with the readings of the pulse sensor in the chest. The sensor of the Garmin Vivoactive HR suffers from a certain delay in the recovery times after the series, but this is not something that the Scosche RHYTHM+ does.

The following example is similar in concept to the previous one, a slightly progressive training ending in uphill acceleration.

Garmin Vivoactive HR - Progressive FC Comparison

All the tests carried out at a constant rate leave the Scosche sensor in good shape. By consulting the data while running on all three watches I could always see that all three sensors were fully in line at all times.

In the one you see below, besides running, at the end of it I had 20 squats and ended with short sprints of 50 meters at maximum intensity. The initial part up to the squats you will see that the three sensors coincide absolutely, but when we reach the final stretch we see discrepancies.

Garmin Vivoactive HR - FC Comparison

So I'm enlarging that fragment to see it in more detail, because with such a color curve it's difficult to appreciate what each one of them has recorded.

Garmin Vivoactive HR - FC ComparisonWhen you stop running and do the squats the drop in heart rate is perfectly detected by the sensors. And in the sprint section both the Garmin HRM-Run sensor and the Scosche RHYTHM+ take the same reading, although you can see a slight delay of a few seconds in the case of the Scosche. The Garmin Elevate of the Vivoactive HR suffers considerably more, as this type of training is where it gets the worst results.

Next I'll tell you about cycling, something that some sensors tend to choke on, especially the new integrated sensors from Garmin and TomTom (as you can see in the Forerunner 235 and TomTom Runner 2On the bike, due to wrist movements and the lack of typical race movement (the sensor uses an algorithm to eliminate the noise produced by that movement), they produce rather erroneous readings.

Here there are different sections that I want to highlight separately. First, I show you the whole activity where you can see two sections of exercise itself and two sections where the pulses fall due to being at rest.

First of all, you can check that all three sensors nail the graph when I'm pedalling. There's nothing to object to in any of the three (the Scosche RHYTHM+ and Mio Link optics, along with the Garmin chest sensor).

Scosche RHYTHM+ - Comparison chart

But when I'm at rest... not so much.

Scosche RHYTHM+ - Comparison chartScosche RHYTHM+ - Comparison chart

It's not easy to make a sensor that can correctly measure both resting and active heart rate. At the moment, there is no perfect optical sensor. Fitbit's has good resting performance, but slightly poorer data quality in intense exercise. Garmin and TomTom have good results in both activity and resting, but fail miserably in obtaining data in cycling. Mio and Scosche have no problems with any activity, but have a really hard time when they have to set their resting heart rate.

So, it's a matter of choosing what will best suit your usual use.

RHYTHM+ or Mio Link?

At this point you're pretty sure you want to replace your old chest strap pulse sensor with one of the new optical sensors, but you don't want to do without your reliable GPS watch or you don't have the budget to buy a new device with a built-in optical sensor.

Scosche RHYTHM+ - Fenix 3

So, the only question left for you to answer is whether Mio Link As you have seen in the tests, the data of both are equally reliable; there are only some small differences that should make you decide between one or the other. These differences are the ones detailed below.

  • Mio Link I've used both sensors for swimming and haven't had any problems with either one. This, which could tip the scale to the Mio's side, doesn't really make much difference. Optical sensors are not designed to have reliable data when swimming. Some days will be better than others, and it should be placed a few inches away from the watch that records the activity, which, as of today, can only be a Suunto Ambit3, Garmin 920xt or Fenix 3 (in the case of Garmin for outdoor swimming, not in a pool).
  • Scosche RHYTHM+ I have even used it as a hare, placing the sensor on the person I was guiding in rhythm and wearing the watch myself to monitor their pulse. I have been able to stand about 8 meters away from the sensor and still receive a constant signal. This is unthinkable for Mio Link, as even wearing the watch on one wrist and Mio Link on the other can cause slight cuts in data reception.
  • Scosche RHYTHM+ If you're not convinced to wear two devices on the same wrist, the Scosche can be worn on the wrist as well as many other parts of your body, but it's much less limited than the Mio Link, which requires you to wear it on one of your two wrists.
  • Mio Link Its strap system is more reliable and ensures that it will not move in the most difficult conditions. The material is key (fabric in the case of the Scosche, rubber in the case of the Mio), and with sudden movements (running sprints or very intense series) it can happen that with sweat the Scosche RHYTHM+ slips. Swimming is also not easy to keep the Scosche sensor in place, even though it can open and fall out from wherever you take it. That while in the pool it wouldn't matter much, in open water it could mean saying goodbye to your sensor... forever. Although I return to point one, these are not really sensors designed for swimming, but I do like to think about a possible use in all three sectors of a triathlon.
  • Both have a control LED, but the Mio Link In addition to pointing out obvious values (power, pairing, etc.) the Scosche sensor will indicate by its LED colours whether you are above, below or in a marked area, and can only be configured from iOS. In contrast, Mio Link allows you to manually or automatically configure three to five zones, each with a colour, so you know exactly which one you are working on. And they also have an Android app.
  • Mio Link It's not that the Scosche sensor is large or uncomfortable, but it is true that Mio's is narrower.
  • Scosche RHYTHM+It's not a mathematical thing, but I do have to wait less time for the Scosche sensor to start punching out heart rate data, which is almost instantaneous. Mio Link usually takes a little longer and I sometimes have to reposition it on my arm (which I think is due to the hair).

My opinion

The Scosche RHYTHM+ sensor behaves perfectly in any situation or sport. Whether running, cycling or simply doing sport in the gym, the heart rate data obtained is totally reliable.

This type of sensor is no longer a novelty - many watches are integrating them directly - but if you want to make the leap to optical measurement and you don't want to "leave your money" on a brand new watch, both Mio Link Both sensors are even more reliable than those found in new devices, at least those from Garmin, Life Q or Polar, but not those licensed by Mio or Valencell (as is the case with the Scosche in the test), which are just as reliable in the products sold with them as those that integrate their technology into the watch itself.

So, Mio Link or Scosche RHYTHM+? I wouldn't have a clear winner, I like both of them quite a lot although maybe the Scosche offers more versatility because of the different options it has to wear it. If you don't decide either my recommendation is simple: buy the one that's cheapest.

Buy Scosche RHYTHM+

Since a few weeks you can buy the Scosche RHYTHM+ in Spain, through Amazon. Before it was not officially distributed in our country and had to be imported in parallel. Below you can see its current price at Amazon Spain.

Remember that if you make the purchase through the link you can see above you will be helping to support the page, and all without any cost to you. This way you save and I get back a small commission that will help the purchase of new devices to perform the following tests.

Don't forget to share the test in your social networks and with your friends, so that they can also be informed. And don't hesitate to comment and subscribe to the comments, many times you will find answers to questions that have not been dealt with in the text of the test. You can use the test comments as a forum and share not only your doubts, but also your opinions of the computer with the rest of the readers.

RATING

Operation - 9.5
Connectivity - 10
Design, finish and comfort - 9
Autonomy - 9
Aplicaciones - 7
Price - 8

8.8

TOTAL

User Rating: 4.08 ( 3 votes)

Do you want to be always up to date?

Join the community

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

Strava

Subscribe

RSS

Related Articles

40 Comments

  1. Eduardo, after reading your analysis of the Scosche heart rate monitor, I decided to buy it through Amazon, and I have to tell you that it fails more than a shotgun. I've used it in several of my training sessions, and I can see how unreliable it is. I still get shot at 170 beats, which brings me down to 97. Anyway, another gatget that doesn't offer what it preaches.

    Perhaps you should try more thoroughly what you advise.

    A salute,

    José Luis Blanquer

    1. I think I can be accused of many things, but not of publishing evidence where I don't prove things thoroughly. Every analysis you see published has WEEKS of evidence. Not just the graphs I publish, but the rest of the battery of tests I perform. And the result of my analysis is not what I say, it's that it's reflected in the published graphs.

      That in your case it doesn't work? It can happen, of course. Because of your skin type. Or your capillarity. Or it's not properly fitted. Or you've just been touched by a faulty unit (which can also happen).

      But that I don't prove thoroughly what I advise? I can't accept it at all, because it's totally uncertain.

    2. Exactly the same, José Luis. Rare is the output that doesn't fail me and goes down to 80 keystrokes, or it loses the signal and I have to restart it. And I have tried to put it in all possible places. Besides, the app, although it recognizes it, doesn't let me do the software update (although I don't think that will solve me much)

      1. CORRECTION of my previous message: after upgrading to the new version it has stopped failing. At least I have about twelve or thirteen perfect trainings, so I am almost sure that it was a problem of the version I had loaded from the factory.
        However, I had to ask a friend for the Iphone to update it, because from the Android version of the app, or at least from my mobile, it's not possible. From the Iphone it's easy and fast.

  2. Consulta, tengo el brasalete Scosche y lo quiero conectar a través de mi celular (BGH JOY SMART A7G); probé varias aplicaciones para ANDROID (ICARDIO, RUNTASTIC, DIFGIT) y si bien el celular me reconoce el Scosche la aplicación no.
    Could you tell me, if you know, what app I can use for my cell phone?

    Greetings

    Michael

  3. Good afternoon, Eduardo.
    First of all, thank you very much for your comprehensive analysis.
    I currently control my training and running races through a Forerunner 220 and the chest strap also from Garmin.
    It all started because the band is about to require replacement.
    After reading the test of the Scosche RHYTHM+ and the Forerunner 230 and 235, I'm thinking about changing everything and I have all the doubts.
    I'll explain so you can advise me.
    My training sessions are not usually based on heart rate, but I do like to control it.
    I do all sorts of long and short runs. Series. Mountain slopes...
    Of these three options which you advise me:
    1) Maintain my Forerunner 220 with the Scosche RHYTHM+
    2) Buy Forerunner 230 with Scosche RHYTHM+
    3) Acquire Forerunner 235
    If you think there might be another option I don't see, I'll thank you.
    Receive a greeting

    1. Of the options you propose, I rule out 2, because in that case I would prefer to go directly to 235. The only reason I would choose 2 is if your series were FC based, because the Scosche optical sensor is better in this case (mainly because of its location).

      The economic option is 1, and it all depends on whether you are willing to spend the extra amount or have enough with the 220.

      If you finally decide to go to 235, watch out for this article tomorrow... "I think" there will be 235 cheap 😉

      1. Hi, Eduardo.
        In the end I chose the option 1) To keep my Forerunner 220 with the Scosche RHYTHM+, although, of course, as the Scosche RHYTHM+ has been given to me by my partner, I suppose to avoid a greater expense.
        I haven't tried it yet, I just got it. I'm waiting for tomorrow morning to try it. I'll tell you.
        I wanted to ask you a question:
        Does the sensor give any low battery signal?
        or do you have to calculate the 8 hours of autonomy?
        I also wanted to comment and that's what I liked least, and is that it has not bought in the link that you provided, to have that little economic contribution and to continue doing these analyses that are so good for almost all of us.
        How could I do it so that you would receive it even if it was directly from me.
        Receive a greeting

        1. Yes, when the sensor is running out of battery the light flashes red. About the help, don't worry, as easy as the next time you make a purchase at Amazon, you remember to stop by :-)

          1. Hi, Eduardo.
            First of all, thank you very much.
            I tried the heart rate monitor today, and I actually did pretty well.
            I've done a 10km print run and compared it with similar ones, controlled with the Garmin chest strap, the data is very similar.
            Only at the beginning of the session was there an unjustified shot of the rhythm (you already indicated that this was happening in the test you did). However, you quickly positioned yourself and the rest of the session worked correctly.
            It's quite comfortable for me to wear... I'm satisfied for the moment.
            ahhh. and the next thing I'll buy it through Amazon. This time it happened because my partner gave it to me, as I was saying, and he went to buy it at a physical store.
            I repeat, thank you very much and receive a greeting.

      2. Could you tell me more about how to access the application in iOS and how to select the workspace, according to the following comments you make in the analysis?
        "And with an application (which is only available in iOS) you can also select a working area. If it flashes purple you're in area, blue below the area, red above it."

        1. The app has changed. It's now Fitness Utility that allows you to update the device, but not change the HR zones.

  4. I am interested in the Scosche RHYTHM+ sensor, to use it in my bike rides. My idea is to use it with my Android phone. The question is, are there free applications that allow me to connect to the sensor and collect the activity in terms of heart rate and pulse-based training zones? From what I have seen, for example Endomondo and Runtastic should support it but in their paid versions.

  5. Hi Eduardo, I made some queries in your analysis of Vivo Active 3, but I thought I could not solve my problem until I read this article. I do several sports like running, cycling, but I realized that when I do high intensity activities in short intervals of time, such as tennis or squash, the optical sensor of the VA3 does not read the pulses immediately but follows a reading pattern every 5-8 seconds, this is why when I reach high peaks but short does not detect them, for example, making a manual calculation of my pulse on my wrist sometimes reach levels of 170 to 180 beats per minute at certain peaks, but the clock does not mark more than 120, and if I wait a few seconds resting rises to 150 when my pulse has already recovered and is at 120-130, ie, in pulses above 120 is not detecting my pulse in real time and delays in reading my exact pulse.
    Do you think this forearm pulse meter will help me to have better information about my heart rate during these activities?
    Greetings and thank you,

    Ferarana

  6. Another query, can you give us more detail on what you mention "cadence lock" or "cadence lock"? Thank you
    Ferarana

  7. Hello Eduardo, I am writing to ask you about this device, I tell you, I need a device that is very reliable because I need to monitor the pulse when I perform a physical activity because I have problems with the heart, I have been reading your recommendations on heart rate sensors and you recommend it. But I wanted to ask you if you would recommend this same device or some other more current since the article is from 2016.
    Thank you very much in advance, I'm waiting for your answer.

    1. The Scosche is still a very good option. The other can also be the Polar OH1The Bluetooth® technology is not supported, but it is only compatible with Bluetooth and it depends on whether the device you are going to use it with supports it.

    2. Eduardo, the Polar OH1, is compatible with the following models:
      Amazfit Stratos, Suunto 3, Garmin Forerunner 235.
      All three have Bluethoot. When choosing the watch, I only have to look for this characteristic?
      Thank you.

  8. Hola, Eduardo. Gracias a tus análisis compré hace un par de años un Forerunner 235 hace un par de años. Estoy encantado con el reloj, pero por problemas en un pie, he tenido que dejar de correr, al menos durante un tiempo. Ahora me he pasado a la bici y claro, tal y como tú has indicado en tus análisis, la lectura de pulso es siendo muy generoso, errática. Como la cinta para el pecho no me resulta cómoda, estoy pensando en comprar un sensor independiente para enlazarlo al 235, y así resolver el problema. Buscando, he encontrado tres opciones que parecen las que mejor encajan con lo que estoy buscando: el Polar OH1, el Wahoo Fitness Tickr Fit y este Scosche Rythm. Por una respuesta anterior que has dado entiendo que el Polar lo tengo que descartar. Entre los otros dos, ¿hay alguno que te parezca más preciso o claramente superior al otro? Gracias

    1. No, the OH1 is not compatible with the FR235.

      The Scosche is a safe bet. The Wahoo Tickr Fit is similar, but the first units were not too fine in cycling, although I do not know if it has improved over time.

      The only drawback of the Scosche is the autonomy, but if the 7 hours are enough for you, I think it would be the best option.

      1. From what you've told me, I'm ruling out the Wahoo. I've seen that this brand has a more modern model, the Rhythm 24, which is a bit more expensive. In your review you indicate that it has a "cycling mode". Is it more accurate than the Rhythm + ?Do you know if it's compatible with my Forerunner 235? Thank you.

  9. From what you've told me, I'm ruling out the Wahoo. I've seen that this brand has a more modern model, the Rhythm 24, which is a bit more expensive. In your review you indicate that it has a "cycling mode". Is it more accurate than the Rhythm + ?Do you know if it's compatible with my Forerunner 235? Thank you.

    1. I haven't tried the Rhythm 24. It has some youthful problems and some functions that haven't come as promised. The main difference with the previous model is the autonomy, the rest is practically the same.

      1. I'm still not sure if the Rhythm 24 is compatible with the Forerunner 235. If it is, the battery life seems to me to be sufficient to make a decision. Do you know if it's compatible or where I could check? I've looked at some tests, even in English, but I haven't seen it anywhere. Thank you.

  10. Buenos días hace poco que lo tengo y en principio va bien, de donde me tengo que bajar la a utilización para el scosche, y que pasos hay quedar. Yo lo único que he echo es bajarme Rhythm sync y me da el programa una actualización pero no sé si es la actualización para el programa o la actualización del scosche un saludo

  11. YO UTILIZO ESTE MISMO EN EL GYM Y LA VERDAD ES QUE POR LARGOS PERIODOS DEJA DE FUNCIONAR Y ESO OCURRE MUY SEGUIDO Y CON DIFERENTES SENSORES QUE PROPORCIONA EL MISMO GYM.
    Y POR MI PARTE ADQUIRÍ EL SENSOR DE POLAR EL OH1 Y EL POLAR IGNITE DESPUÉS DE PROBARLO 2 MESES SIN PROBLEMA ALGUNO Y ES MAS CÓMODO EL BRAZALETE.
    NO DIGO QUE SEA MALO SIMPLEMENTE A MI NO ME FUNCIONA TAL VEZ POR MI TONO DE PIEL.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Through this form the data are treated with the only purpose of being able to manage your comments.

These data will be recorded on the server, unless you check the box to subscribe to the newsletter that will be stored in the list of Mailchimp (which also complies with all laws). At any time you can request both the cancellation of any of the emails and the removal of all your data.

For more information you can check the privacy policies for more information on where, how and why I store your data.

And I'm sorry about the bilge, but I'm obliged to put it in.

Back to top button